We need a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty – and we need it now | Andrew Simms and Peter Newell
Climate breakdown is an imminent threat to humanity. But an international treaty could avert calamity
How did government respond to the recent scientific conclusion that only “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society” can deliver the globally agreed target for stopping climate breakdown? In the UK, fracking for fossil fuels was given the green light, plans were announced for a huge new road in the south-east, incentives for electric vehicles withered, the expansion of Heathrow airport is still going ahead and Gatwick airport is trying to expand too by bringing a back-up runway into use. It’s like seeing a sign that says “Danger: vertical cliff drop” and pulling on your best running shoes to take a flying leap.
Something isn’t working. The head of the oil company Shell responded to the new climate science warming by clarifying that “Shell’s core business is, and will be for the foreseeable future, very much in oil and gas.” BP announced new North Sea oil projects. Immediate choices are being made with blank disregard to avoiding climate breakdown.
Source: Guardian Transport
<a href="We need a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty – and we need it now | Andrew Simms and Peter Newell” target=”_blank”>We need a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty – and we need it now | Andrew Simms and Peter Newell